Two Weeks to Decide TIF District 04 Jul 12

They’re taking it under advisement with a decision in two weeks …

The Thief River Falls City Council last night hearing from residents, public officials, developers and business leaders as a full house turned out for a public hearing on establishing a Tax Increment Financing District to host a new apartment complex on South Pennington. Resident Tim Benedict appealed to the council to get beyond what he called the “rah, rah and the bull kah kah” to consider the “wisdom of the proposal …”

Educators, business leaders and community organizers testified last night to the critical shortage of housing after Public Finance Officer, Rebecca Kurtz laid out the proposal for TIF financing, a 26 year reimbursement of property taxes to subsidize development of infrastructure for the proposed complex, known as Rocksbury Apartments. Residents questioned the need for this project with TIF financing already approved for 2 previous projects, although Kurtz said last night, in both cases, developers are having difficulty finding investors.

No one in the audience appeared to disagree with the need for temporary, short term, affordable housing – however Benedict and others said there is an issue of fairness, with other property owners paying the full burden of property taxes while the housing project gets a temporary deferral – questioning whether the TIF District was truly needed to make the project a reality.

Attorney Mark Granger- representing property owner Karl Bjorkman – reminded the council that the purpose of the hearing was to listen and consider the issue, objecting to the resolution to create the TIF District, already drawn up and included in last night’s agenda. Ultimately, the Council did listen, for more than 2 hours – tabling the resolution to give the Council time to consider last night’s testimony with a vote in 2 weeks, at the next regular meeting July 17th.

  • Watch1

    I was able to watch the City Council meeting tonight on TV. I was overwhelmed.
    I suggest that those of you who were unable to attend the Council meeting to watch it on TV, Channel 13 at 7 or 8.

  • Bewildered

    I was shocked that there was not one question from city council members. Has this been in the works long enough they have already made up their mind? Are they not concerned about the information presented? Does anyone care that this would be a band aid? Looks like the council basically works for Digi Key on this issue. Yes housing is needed but does ANY council member or higher ups a Digi Key recognize the problems with this area or they just don’t care.

    TIF is not needed here. Save the next TIF district for the area the hospital is located. What a way to revitalize the downtown area.

    Back to my first comment….COUNCIL MEMBERS WAKE UP AND ASK SOME QUESTIONS. NO QUESTONS? YOU UNDERSTOOD EVERYTHING THAT WAS SAID? YOU HAD NO COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? ARE YOU JUST COMFORTABLE RUBBER STAMPING A BAND AID? I AM BEWILDERED.

  • stayonyourtoes

    Lets not forget that Mr Bjorkman is sueing the city for improper rezonig procedure. Who know what that will bring. What happens if he wins and then the city has granted the TIF financing on the property? I’ll bet that will cost a pile to get sorted out by some lawyers. I really dont get TIF financing very well and I tried hard to follow it on TV. I really cant imagine that anyone in the room got it. Its really complicated. As any second year political science major knows, when government things get complicated that usually indicates its been around too long and there are too many opportuinties for things to go wrong and too many ways to manipulate the system. The TIF lady is there to process the funding and collect the fees for that so shes not much help but I do have to give her credit for putting the fact finding in the hands of the council and not lawyers. I’d love to know her companies cut of the millions.

  • Rock67

    People in the community need to know that if the City Council and Mayor approve
    > the TIF zone the City will “refund” the developer for the cost of the
    > land, cost for site prep for the land, cost for removing the house
    > and cost for putting in the infrastructure. The amount being
    > requested for TIF reimbursement is $3.2 million dollars.
    >
    > The fact is there are several other pieces of property for sale that
    > the City has previously planned to be developed as multi family housing, these
    > properties are for sale for substantially less money than the
    > Pennington Ave property, they are zoned correctly for multiple family
    > housing, have the infrastructure in place, and these properties are
    > located near Arctic Cat and Digi Key others are located near shopping
    > and entertainment.
    >
    > These other properties could be developed for substantially less than
    > the Pennington Ave. property and cost the city substantially less.
    >
    > The community cannot allow an out of town developer to pick the most
    > expensive piece of land requiring the highest development costs and
    > expect the city to refund/reimburse them for these costs.